Lawmakers are inching their way towards a new model for remote proceedings that relies on a few basic principles — the most important of which is that it be optional and driven by litigants’ own choices. Other general guidelines call for more use of remote proceedings for more minor cases, criminal arraignments, family and juvenile, but few to none in jury trials, especially ones involving felonies.
Much of a four-hour hearing in the Calif...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In