This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Civil Procedure,
Appellate Practice

Apr. 10, 2023

A case study in what not to do when amending complaints

“When a complaint contains allegations that are fatal to a cause of action,” stated Justice M. Bruce Smith, “a plaintiff cannot avoid those defects by simply filing an amended complaint that omits the problematic facts or pleads facts inconsistent with those alleged earlier.”

Garret D. Murai

Partner
Nomos LLP

Garret is the editor of the California Construction Law Blog at www.calconstructionlawblog.com.

See more...

Fights between owners and contractors under Business and Professions Code section 7031 can get mean and nasty. An owner's remedy under Section 7031, as courts have stated, can be "unjust," "harsh[ ]," and even "draconian" - and damages can be significant. The next case, Panterra GP, Inc. v. Superior Court, 74 Cal.App.5th 697 (2022) is no different. It even involved a disagreement between the very justices deciding the case.

The P...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up