9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
May 17, 2023
No superior court can review utility commission actions
Judge Richard B. Ulmer issued his ruling in a lawsuit brought against PG&E by Winding Creek Solar LLC, an alternative energy company that has tried to compel PG&E to enter into a 20-year purchase agreement for the solar energy it produces under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act.
A San Francisco judge ruled Tuesday that no superior court in the state has the jurisdiction to review actions by the California Public Utilities Commission as he sustained a demurrer from Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
Judge Richard B. Ulmer issued his ruling in a lawsuit brought against PG&E by Winding Creek Solar LLC, an alternative energy company that has tried to compel PG&E to enter into a 20-year purchase agreement for the sol...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In