This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

State Bar & Bar Associations,
California Supreme Court

May 22, 2023

Justices unaware bar didn’t always apply suspended attorney rule

The California Supreme Court found out about this more than 32-year-old practice on Jan. 31, in a letter from State Bar Court Presiding Judge Richard Honn, and on Friday ordered the practice to end by Sept. 1, except in rare cases.

For more than 32 years, at least, when suspending attorneys for less than 90 days, State Bar judges have followed an informal practice of not requiring them to notify their clients, the courts or opposing parties as required by California Rule of Court 9.20.

The California Supreme Court found out about this practice on Jan. 31, in a letter from State Bar Court Presiding Judge Richard Honn, and on Friday ordered the practice to end by Sept....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up