This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation

Jun. 1, 2023

Uber, Lyft drivers may have to arbitrate business model claims

The plaintiffs claimed that the companies’ business models exploited their drivers and suppressed their pay by preventing drivers from charging for rides off their apps. Both Uber and Lyft denied that their business models constitute anticompetitive behavior.

A proposed class action by drivers for Lyft Inc. and Uber Technologies Inc. alleging antitrust violations and a price fixing scheme is on the ropes after the companies asked a San Francisco judge to send the case to arbitration Wednesday.

The plaintiffs claimed that the companies’ business models exploited their drivers and suppressed their pay by preventing drivers from charging for rides off their apps in addition to other anticompetitiv...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up