State Bar & Bar Associations
Jun. 26, 2023
Eastman invokes privilege when asked to name others
John C. Eastman declined to answer a State Bar prosecutor when asked to identify people with whom he had discussed alternate electors.
John C. Eastman with his attorney, Randall A. Miller, at the State Bar Court. Ricardo Pineda / Daily Journal
John Eastman declined on Friday to tell State Bar prosecutors who it was he discussed gathering alternate electors with after the voting ended in the 2020 presidential election, citing attorney client privilege and confidentiality.
“The people I spoke to about that were either clients or prospective clients, and their communications are protected by attorney client privilege,” Eastman told State Bar prosecutor Duncan C. Carling during his ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In