This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Jun. 28, 2023

State high court hears arguments against at-large elections

Santa Monica, despite being just 13.6% Latino, has a majority of Latinos on the city council. Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP noted that the court-ordered adoption of district elections would force one of those council members off.

State Supreme Court justices quizzed attorneys for the city of Santa Monica and a neighborhood group Tuesday in a case to determine whether the city’s at-large election system is permissible under the California Voting Rights Act.

The oral arguments placed the advocates in somewhat unusual positions. An attorney for the city, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, argued that a victory for the neighborhood group would ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up