This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Aug. 2, 2023

Energizer, Walmart seek dismissal of 3 suits over prices

“These lawsuits are a baseless attempt to turn a manufacturer’s exercise of its well-established right to choose the prices, terms and conditions of its dealings with retailers into a supposed antitrust conspiracy,” attorneys for the two company’s said in a motion.

Energizer Holdings Inc. and Walmart Inc. asked a federal judge in Oakland to dismiss claims from three sets of plaintiffs who accused the companies of entering anticompetitive agreements to artificially inflate the prices and profits on Energizer batteries.

Energizer and Walmart maintained in their motion on Monday that their conduct was not inappropriate or damaging to competition. They argued to U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up