This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Class Action,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Dec. 6, 2023

Tinder settlement nixed, plaintiff has conflict of interest

Michael Rubin, a partner with Altshuler Berzon LLP who represents the objectors, hailed the panel’s rejection of a settlement he said “would have deprived 24,000 class members of a reasonable recovery.”

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday rejected a class settlement with the owner of the Tinder dating app, ruling that the plaintiff has a conflict of interest with other members of the class and failed to vigorously litigate the case.

Objectors who filed a similar complaint against Tinder in state court raised objections to the proposed settlement, which they said would deprive them of a chance of pursuing their own claims....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up