This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jan. 9, 2024

Shooting holes through the meaning of obstruction

By granting certiorari, the Supreme Court has indicated that at least four justices are interested in considering whether Subsection (2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley statute applies broadly to obstructive acts.

John H. Minan

Emeritus Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law

Professor Minan is a former attorney with the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and the former chairman of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board.

In United States v. Fischer, 23-5572 (2023), the Supreme Court has granted certiorari to consider whether the D.C. Circuit committed error in broadly interpreting the federal obstruction statute (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1512(c)) against the defendants who allegedly participated in the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.

The decision is likely to affect the government’s case against former President D...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)