This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jan. 18, 2024

When it comes to damages recovery, design patents trump utility patents

Determination of reasonable royalty is often difficult to prove and can leave a large portion of the profits with the infringer. Lost profits, on the other hand, corresponds to the sales the patent owner would have made if it had not been for the infringement.

Dariush Adli

President, ADLI Law Group

444 S Flower St
Los Angeles , CA 90071

Email: adli@adlilaw.com

Univ of Michigan Law Sch; Ann Arbor MI

Design patents are not as popular as their better-known sibling, i.e., utility patents, but based on an unexplained discrepancy in the law, they have an advantage over utility patents when it comes to damages recovery for patent infringement.

In the U.S., about 5% of patent applications filed each year pertain to design patents, with almost all the rest corresponding to utility patents. The two patent types play distinct roles in protecti...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)