Dariush Adli

Intellectual Property U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Intellectual Property, Civil Procedure Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Intellectual Property, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Intellectual Property, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Ediscovery, Contracts, Alternative Dispute Resolution 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Contracts Intellectual Property, Health Care & Hospital Law Intellectual Property U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation Intellectual Property Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Intellectual Property Contracts Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation Intellectual Property, Corporate Intellectual Property Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports Intellectual Property U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Practice U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation Intellectual Property Law Practice Intellectual Property Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, Constitutional Law Intellectual Property

Title	Category	Published
When is a design patent indefinite?	Apr. 14, 2025
Supreme Court hits reset on copyright damages window	Dec. 5, 2024
Clarifying standing in patent infringement lawsuits	Sep. 18, 2024
Appeals Court decision makes it easier to preclude enforcement of patent rights	May 1, 2024
Significance of ‘objective criteria’ in determination of patent validity	Apr. 9, 2024
When it comes to damages recovery, design patents trump utility patents	Jan. 18, 2024
Turning a blind eye to trademark infringement	Oct. 25, 2023
Statutory copyright damages eligibility for group v. singular registration	Sep. 6, 2023
Supreme Court's Jack Daniel's decision strengthens and expands trademark rights	Jun. 26, 2023
Warhol decision strengthens and expands copyright protection	Jun. 8, 2023
Clarifying the defense of de minimis use in copyright infringement	May 24, 2023
Limitations on discovery and unconscionability in employment arbitration contracts	Apr. 4, 2023
Uncertain fate of AB 51 and PAGA arbitration prohibition	Dec. 20, 2022
California court excuses performance of COVID-impacted contract	Sep. 12, 2022
Moderna fires first shot in COVID vaccine patent wars	Aug. 30, 2022
Combining design patent and trade dress for optimal IP protection	Jul. 12, 2022
Subject matter eligibility for obtaining patent protection	Jun. 22, 2022
Copyright protection for public performances of pre-1972 music	Mar. 1, 2022
Recognizing the value of nontraditional trademarks	Feb. 3, 2022
California, 9th Circuit again on collision course with the Supreme Court	Sep. 29, 2021
The importance of brands to businesses in the post-COVID economy	Jun. 17, 2021
Dealing with contracts affected by COVID-19, part 2	May 11, 2021
Consideration of non-traditional trademarks in branding strategy	May 4, 2021
Design patents: the forgotten, underappreciated sibling of utility patents	Feb. 25, 2021
Inexpensive yet effective IP protection in the age of COVID-19	Jan. 21, 2021
Choosing how to protect COVID-19-related inventions	Dec. 1, 2020
Increasing the likelihood of attorney fee recovery in patent cases	Sep. 10, 2020
6 tips for businesses on identifying and protecting inventions	Aug. 31, 2020
Monetizing your IP to cushion the economic impact of COVID-19	Jul. 14, 2020
Coming revisions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act	Jul. 1, 2020
Intellectual property protection for California cannabis businesses	Jun. 2, 2020
High court ruling likely to make trademarks more valuable	May 19, 2020
Patent protection and the coronavirus	May 7, 2020
COVID-19 and commercial frustration	Apr. 23, 2020
Supreme Court to decide if recovery of trademark infringer’s profits requires willfulness	Apr. 14, 2020
Ruling will make it harder to prove copyright infringement	Apr. 3, 2020
Understanding the copyright small claims court law	Nov. 12, 2019
Sealing celebrity confidential information: A matter of public interest?	Nov. 16, 2018
EU high court OKs color trademark for Louboutin shoes	Nov. 7, 2018
A hybrid strategy for protecting your cannabis-related IP	Aug. 29, 2018
Who’s an employee? The impact of Dynamex	Jul. 2, 2018
Amazon patents blur human-robot line	Apr. 18, 2018
The art of protecting fashion designs	Sep. 12, 2017

Case Name	Topic	Role	Published
Lubby Holdings LLC, Vaporous Technologies Inc. v. Henry Chung, Deepvapes Inc. dba Boom Vaporizers; Does 1-10, inclusive	Intellectual Property	Plaintiff	Jul. 5, 2019
A.C.T. 898 Products Inc. v. W.S. Industries Inc., Vinh Lam, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive	Intellectual Property	Plaintiff	May 20, 2017
North Atlantic Operating Company Inc., National Tobacco Company LLP v. Desertstar Wholesale aka Desert Star Wholesale; Simple Pay Point Inc.; Ali Hasan Alsaqqa; Mustafa Abdel Zeidan; Country Cash N Carry aka A1 Cash & Carry fka Courtesy Wholesale; Ramzi Saba and John Does 1 through 99 inclusive	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Sep. 5, 2015
Novelty Textile Inc. v. The Wet Seal Inc., Hot Shot HK, LLC and Does	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Mar. 28, 2015
Mophie Inc. v. Dharmesh Shah aka David Shah dba Source Vista; Livingsocial Inc.; Serve Global LLC dba Sourcevista.com	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Feb. 28, 2015
Eclipse IP LLC v. Paybyphone Technologies Inc.	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Oct. 4, 2014
Hydrodynamic Industrial Co Ltd v. Green Max Distributors Inc.	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Nov. 30, 2013
James J. Braddock v. Angelina Jolie, GK Films, FilmDistrict, Scout Film, Edin Sarkic	Intellectual Property	Plaintiff	Jun. 22, 2013
Sealant Systems International Inc. and Accessories Marketing Inc. v. TEK Global S.R.L. and TEK Corp.	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Jun. 13, 2013
Grand General Accessories Manufacturing, a California corp. v. United Pacific Industries Inc., a California corp.; Lucidity Enterprise Co. Ltd., a corp. of Taiwan	Intellectual Property	Defendant	May 14, 2011
Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels v. Direct Tire & Wheel Inc.	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Apr. 16, 2011
SKC Kolon PI Inc., SKC Inc. v. Kaneka Corporation	Intellectual Property	Defendant	Mar. 5, 2011
QBAS Co., Ltd., QDS Injection Molding LLC v. Chapman-Walters Intercoastal Corp., Body Glove International LLC	Intellectual Property	Plaintiff	Feb. 26, 2011

Title	Category	Published
Who’s an employee? The impact of Dynamex	Employment	Jul. 2, 2018