This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

Jan. 31, 2024

Carmakers’ bid to pause anti-theft device proceeding denied

“The question posed here pertains to three of the 16 pending claims, and the court sees no reason that litigation on the remaining 13 claims should not proceed on schedule,” U.S. District Judge James V. Selna ruled.

A federal judge overseeing a multidistrict vehicle anti-theft device litigation involving Kia America Inc. and Hyundai Motor America denied the automakers’ bid to pause the proceedings.

However, U.S. District Judge James V. Selna in Santa Ana partially granted the automakers’ bid to certify interlocutory appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals regarding a handful of negligence claims under New York, Ohio and Wisconsin law. He denied...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)