This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Feb. 12, 2024

Expertise in Privette doctrine wins appeal, law firm says

“We saw that the Privette doctrine could be a possible defense. It’s a really positive policy for defendants and the Supreme Court has really sound policy reasons for the Privette doctrine,” said Gregory A. Mase of Tyson & Mendes.

Tyson & Mendes LLP defeated an appeal by an injured construction worker seeking to hold the firm's general contractor client liable for his injuries as opposed to his direct employer.

The opinion, which was filed on Dec. 13 and written by 1st District Court of Appeal Justice Kathleen M. Banke, affirmed San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard B. Ulmer's September 2022 decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Tyson & Mendes'...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)