Labor/Employment
Feb. 29, 2024
Fox, Tubi say counsel wrongly used privileged documents
“This is a textbook example of attorney-client privilege. It is individual at the company, emailing a lawyer providing information and asking, can you assist,” said Molly M. Lens of O’Melveny & Myers LLP.
Attorneys for Tubi Inc. and its parent company, Fox Corp., told a San Francisco judge Wednesday that attorneys for the lead plaintiff in a putative gender discrimination class action improperly used privileged documents while taking the deposition of a potential witness.
The lawsuit accuses Tubi of having a “poisonous corporate culture of misogyny” that systemically discriminates against female employees by paying them less than their male...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In