A Los Angeles County judge on Tuesday denied a motion for a protective order filed by a Brink’s armored transport employee, saying there was no factual showing that she had an interest in protecting confidential discovery requested of her in a lawsuit stemming from a large jewelry heist.
“Instead, she contends that ‘Brink’s could never recover its loss from a disclosure of the requested information to a competitor, criminals, or the publi...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In