This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Mar. 18, 2024

New Court of Appeal decision allows insureds to video record examinations under oath

A recent Court of Appeal ruling could create new challenges and uncertainties for insurers, such as a chilling effect on adjuster participation, potential gamesmanship by policyholders’ attorneys, and possible interference with off-the-record discussions and informal agreements.

John D. Edson

Partner, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

501 W Broadway
San Diego , CA 92101

Phone: (619) 338-6616

Email: JEdson@sheppardmullin.com

UC Berkeley SOL; Berkeley CA

Preston B. Bennett

Associate, Sheppard Mullin

Shutterstock

When faced with a suspicious claim, insurers often request that an insured answer questions about the claim in an examination under oath (EUO). The insured's rights at an EUO are enumerated by statute. Ins. Code § 2071.1. Historically, courts have focused on an insured's failure to comply with the policy's EUO requirement. But in a new decision, the California Court of Appeal held that an insured has a right to video record the EUO. This expansive interpretation of a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)