This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation

Mar. 19, 2024

State gets jury trial against 8 financial services companies

The state accuses the banks of conspiring to artificially inflate bond interest rates through a “robo-resetting” scheme. The defendants have denied wrongdoing. The judge ruled that the plaintiff’s request for a jury trial was timely, despite the defendants’ argument that it would prejudice them.

SAN FRANCISCO — A superior court judge on Monday granted the state of California’s request for a jury trial nearly nine years after its former counsel “inadvertently failed” to pay the jury fees in a qui tam action accusing eight of the country’s biggest financial institutions of conspiring to artificially inflate bond interest rates as part of an alleged “robo-resetting” scheme.

According to the seventh amended complaint, filed on behalf ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)