For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters

Mar. 19, 2024

The Supreme Court got it right in Trump v. Anderson

U.C. Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky criticizes the Supreme Court’s conclusion but fails to acknowledge that Section 3 can only be implemented and enforced through legislation enacted by Congress.

Kris Whitten

Retired California deputy attorney gener,

U.C. Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky's article in the March 12 Daily Journal entitled "Unanimous, but wrong," uses questionable analysis about how to interpret the U.S. Constitution in reaching his conclusion that all nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices erred in Trump v. Anderson, 218 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2024)...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Related Content

Constitutional Law

Trump v. Anderson

States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency.

Administrative Agencies

National Labor Relations Board v. SW General Inc. dba Southwest Ambulance

Federal Vacancies Reform Act Section 3345(b)(2) renders complaint filed on behalf of NLRB's acting general counsel invalid where President had nominated him for permanent position.



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.