This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Apr. 15, 2024

After Fortenberry, where do false statement prosecutions go?

The Ninth Circuit's rejection of the "effects-based" venue test in false statement cases deepens an existing circuit split and significantly complicates how federal prosecutors, defense attorneys, and witnesses approach the question of venue not just in false statement cases, but in any case, where alleged acts take place in multiple jurisdictions.

A. Joseph Jay III

Partner, SheppardMullin

Douglas Yang

Partner, SheppardMullin

Phone: (213) 620-1780

Email: dyang@sheppardmullin.com

Shutterstock

Former U.S. Congressman Jeffrey Fortenberry was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for making false statements to federal investigators (18 U.S.C. § 1001), regarding illegal campaign contributions made by a foreign national through conduit donors. These statements were allegedly made during interviews conducted in-person in Nebraska and Washington, D.C. However, the trial was held in Los Angelesbecause the government argued, and the court held that ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)