This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Contracts

May 21, 2025

Sanctions clash in music app's contract dispute with Apple

Winston & Strawn and WilmerHale attorneys are asking a federal judge to sanction each other in an escalating contract dispute involving Apple's removal of the music app Musi from the App Store. At issue: whether claims of collusion were supported by evidence--or crossed the line into litigation abuse.

A showdown erupted with law firms requesting sanctions--and sanctions to punish the sanctions filings--in a music streamer's contract dispute against Apple.

Winston & Strawn LLP attorneys representing plaintiff Musi Inc., a free music streaming app, asked a federal judge in San Jose to sanction opposing counsel from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, representing defendant Apple Inc.

The claim is that WilmerHale made a "frivolous" sanctions reque...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up