This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Jun. 3, 2025

Union, private firm clash over state's use of outside counsel

The case centers on whether the state improperly bypassed the Attorney General's Office--and a judge called the agency's no-show at the hearing "unprecedented."

SACRAMENTO--A long-simmering dispute over the privatization of legal work within California government reached a milestone Monday, as the union representing state-employed attorneys squared off in court against a private law firm hired by the State Controller's Office--without the usual blessing of the Attorney General.

In a case that spotlights deep tensions over how and when outside counsel can be used, the California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges, and Hearing Office...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up