This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Jun. 4, 2025

Ex-employees' communications wrongly shielded, Meta argues

Meta urges a judge to compel whistleblowers to disclose communications, arguing his ruling overly protects former employees' First Amendment rights without sufficient evidence in social media addiction litigation.

Ex-employees' communications wrongly shielded, Meta argues
Novikov Aleksey/Shutterstock

Meta Platforms Inc. asked a federal judge in Oakland on Tuesday to force two former-employees-turned-whistleblowers to turn over communications with other Meta staffers that defendants claim are central to the sprawling social media addiction multidistrict litigation against some of the world's largest tech companies.

Meta argues that the judge's ruling wrongly shields former employees' communications from discovery, claiming an overly broad First Amendment right of as...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up