Real Estate/Development,
Civil Litigation
Aug. 6, 2025
Lawsuit challenges city housing fees as unconstitutional exactions
A property owner is suing East Palo Alto in federal court, claiming the city's inclusionary housing ordinance imposes unconstitutional fees or rental mandates unrelated to his proposed modest development.





A property owner in East Palo Alto has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the city's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, arguing that it unlawfully demands tens of thousands of dollars in fees or mandates low-income rentals unrelated to the impacts of the modest residential development.
Represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, Wesley Yu contends the city's policy constitutes an unconstitutional "extortion" of property rights, citing recent U.S. Supreme Court pre...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In