This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 19, 2025

Gun owners ask Supreme Court to review California's magazine ban

Attorneys Paul Clement and Erin Murphy have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down California's ban on large-capacity magazines, but legal experts say the justices may hesitate to take up the issue without five votes lined up.

Hoping to persuade one more U.S. Supreme Court justice to take the case, attorneys Paul D. Clement and Erin E. Murphy argued in a petition that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrongly ruled that California's ban on large-capacity magazines is constitutional.

The writ of certiorari, filed Friday by partners with Clement Murphy PLLC, asked the Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit decision. The justices have yet to accept the petition. Duncan et al. v. Bonta, 2...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up