This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Data Privacy

Sep. 8, 2025

Guidance needed on legality of website tracking, judge suggests

A San Francisco judge allowed a privacy lawsuit against Future US to proceed, suggesting appellate guidance is needed on whether website tracking tools qualify as illegal surveillance under California's wiretap laws.

Guidance needed on legality of website tracking, judge suggests
Judge Jeffrey S. Ross

A putative class action that could shape the way websites acquire the personal information of visitors received a boost Friday after a San Francisco judge overruled a demurrer against the complaint but suggested the Court of Appeal needs to provide tracking technology definitions.

The action against publisher Future US -- whose collection of websites includes TechRadar and PCGamer.com -- claims it violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) when it used tracking technol...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up