This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Constitutional Law,
California Supreme Court,
California Courts of Appeal

Oct. 1, 2025

California Supreme Court case could reshape cities' borrowing powers

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association challenges San Jose's $3.5 billion pension bond, saying voters must approve the debt -- a case that could reverberate in cities across California.

California Supreme Court case could reshape cities' borrowing powers
Justice Allison M. Danner of the 6th District Court of Appeal

In a case with potentially wide implications, the state Supreme Court will consider arguments next week by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and another taxpayer group that the San Jose City Council's approval of a $3.5 billion pension obligation bond must be approved by voters.

The justices' decision about whether San Jose's move violates the state Constitution will affect not only San Jose but two Southern California cities, Escondido and Oxnard. Oral argument...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up