Shutterstock
Two years after Mata v. Avianca, lawyers are still citing fabricated cases. Georgia attorney Diana Lynch: 13 fake cases across two briefs. California attorney Amir Mostafavi: 21 fabricated quotes. Federal judges in New Jersey and Mississippi: orders containing AI-generated errors.
Every fabrication was eventually caught. But not before clients paid for appeals based on fiction, judges verified nonexistent authority, and courts ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




