This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Nov. 12, 2025

Before the ash settles California must learn from Katrina

California's wildfire litigation is echoing the post-Katrina struggle over causation, with courts now facing the pivotal question of whether smoke damage counts as "direct physical loss" -- a decision that will shape recovery for years to come.

Chip Merlin

Founder and President
Merlin Law Group

See more...

Before the ash settles California must learn from Katrina
Shutterstock

After major disasters, certain legal questions tend to define the course of litigation. Following Hurricane Katrina, much of the dispute centered on wind versus water. In the wake of the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, a similar axis has emerged -- fire versus smoke. The parallels are striking, but the differences are equally revealing. For California lawyers, judges, and claims professionals, Katrina's lasting lesson is clear: identifying and resolving the central ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up