This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Consumer Law,
Civil Litigation

Dec. 17, 2025

Most OnlyFans 'chatter scam' claims dismissed, lawyers sanctioned over AI briefs

A federal judge tossed most OnlyFans class claims and imposed $13,000 sanctions after lawyers filed AI-generated briefs with false citations, while granting plaintiffs leave to amend jurisdictional and substantive allegations.

A federal judge in Santa Ana dismissed most claims in a putative class action accusing OnlyFans of "Chatter Scams," while separately sanctioning plaintiffs' lawyers for submitting AI-generated briefs riddled with false and mischaracterized legal authority.

U.S. District Judge Fred W. Slaughter granted motions to dismiss by OnlyFans' parent and related defendants but allowed plaintiffs leave to amend and imposed $13,000 in Rule 11 sanctions after rejecting a requ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up