A decade-old patent lawsuit against portable camera-maker GoPro was finally decided in October, but it could be headed for a new trial.
Both sides argue that one of the claims the jury threw out depended on the one it found valid, making the verdict inconsistent. U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick acknowledged there was an inconsistency in the verdict form.
"I think I know what they mean, but they have determined that there is no infringement on any of the produc...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




