This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

May 20, 2026

Cox fighting: the Supreme Court's contributory liability opinion has limits when it comes to AI

See more on Cox fighting: the Supreme Court's contributory liability opinion has limits when it comes to AI

Nathaniel L. Bach

Partner
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

See more...

Cox fighting: the Supreme Court's contributory liability opinion has limits when it comes to AI

Intellectual property disputes often buck the usual partisan divides that characterize many high-profile Supreme Court cases. So it was in March 2026, when Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for a unanimous court in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, 146 S. Ct. 959 (2026) to clarify the scope of the contributory liability doctrine under U.S. copyright law, vacating one of the largest copyright infringement awards in the process. Cox has sparked discussi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up