This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Technology

Sep. 8, 2026

Social media addiction lawsuits test limits of Section 230

Plaintiffs are increasingly arguing that addictive platform features are defective product designs rather than third-party content, a theory that could reshape liability for social media companies and other technology firms.

For decades, social media companies have relied on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to shield them from liability for content posted by users.

"Social media companies have essentially said in the past, 'We're not responsible for anything,'" UC Law San Francisco professor Robin Feldman said. "And that has worked, until recently."

Now, plaintiffs suing Meta, YouTube and other platforms over alleged teen social media addiction are...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up