This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Conscientious Objectors?

By Ryan H. Wu Brian Cardile | Nov. 10, 2017

Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court

Nov. 10, 2017

Conscientious Objectors?

In 'Hernandez v. Restoration Hardware,' argued Tuesday, Ryan Wu (Capstone Law APC) says the California Supreme Court has a chance to deter bad faith objectors from hijacking class action resolutions, but the court must untangle a knot of conflicting precedent bearing on unnamed class members' rights on appeal.


This week our guest Ryan Wu unpacks Hernandez v. Restoration Hardware, a class action appeal argued before the California Supreme Court this week. The case specifically asks whether unnamed class members who did not intervene during a class action may nonetheless appeal when a lower court dismisses objections they file against class action dispositions, be them judgments or settlements. Wu is a senior counsel with Capstone Law APC, who often handles his firm's class action settlements, and says that the court has an opportunity in this case to protect class action litigation against what he says is the fairly common occurrence of bad faith objectors trying to gum up class claim resolutions with protracted appeals, perhaps seeking to extort class plaintiffs. In the Fourth District's appellate ruling, the appeals court, Wu says, surprised many class action attorneys by dismissing a prominent line of case law in its ruling in order to dust off and reassert a 75-year old California high court ruling that seems to disfavor the objector's position in this case.
We'll also hear from our reporters Chase DiFeliciantonio and Nick Sonnenburg about prominent immigration and establishment clauses cases in the 9th Circuit.


Brian Cardile

Daily Journal Staff Writer

For reprint rights:

Email for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

If you would like to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, call (213) 229-5558.

Send a letter to the editor: