Five recent cases bear careful attention when considering applicability of the new amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Recent notices sent by several school districts last month to parents of California public school children have caused concern...

Here's a few things to keep in mind if you are seeking, or opposing, review in the California Supreme Court. By Robert J. Stum...

In recent years, insurance companies have issued cyber insurance policies that provide coverage for, among other things, wrong...

Anyone in Los Angeles in the 1990s saw parts of George Holliday's footage of the Rodney King beating. The principle question p...

Unlike other hackers, perpetrators of ransomware are not after the underlying information itself. Instead, they hold data host...

The impact of a British exit from the EU for California business are unclear, but are likely to be felt by those with operatio...

The court's decision not to review California Building Industry Association v. City of San Jose comes as a sweet relief...

To say that "interpreting everything that's being said" is an "established interpreting standard" is quite a stretch, to say t...

When the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Utah v. Strieff last week, Justice Scalia's passing was marked with a bla...

Hedge fund manager Kyle Bass says that an IPR challenge against a single drug costs approximately $1 million. By J. Gregory Si...

There are three conventional ways for exiting a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, but a fourth alternative, the "structured dismissa...

On Feb. 17, the 9th Circuit haded down its long-awaited opinion in Sarver v. Chartier, which included both procedural a...

Considerable commentary has focused on Justice Antonin Scalia's wit in dissent, but what has received less emphasis is his ski...

The objective of this article and accompanying self-assessment test is to provide bench officers and lawyers with an introduct...

Having represented plaintiffs in civil practice for 25 years, I refuse to demonize defense attorneys in any way because I cons...

On March 2, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, concerning laws enacted in Texas req...

In a case which might be of considerable concern to certain attorneys, the 4th District Court of Appeal recently held the stat...

The Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear U.S. v. Salman, a case that will affect scores of pending insider tradi...

How you feel about rising legal costs and lawyer hourly rates may depend on where you fit on the continuum, and whether you ar...

The Reproductive FACT Act, which requires that all unlicensed facilities providing prenatal care provide certain information t...

Given the text and structure of the constitution, limiting the 'advisory measure' power is decision for the voters, not the co...

If there were an Oscar awarded to the most overlooked provision in the California Code of Civil Procedure, it might go to Sect...

Chinese lawmakers recently enacted the Counter-Terrorism Law of the People's Republic of China, which took effect Jan. 1.

While Scalia's legacy ought to take precedence during this time of mourning, widespread panic over the future of health care r...

The Supreme Court issued a rare ruling in Amgen Inc. v. Harris, reversing without full briefing or oral argument a 9th ...

Apple's ongoing showdown with the Justice Department over an iPhone is raising much-needed public awareness of the role of enc...

Chances are that virtually everyone reading this column has a smartphone. So how should trial lawyers adapt to this new realit...

Once again, events "out there" have intruded into our parochial little world of land use and such, but on a grander scale. As ...

It appears that Obama's game plan may be relegated to nominating a candidate that Senate Republicans could not block without r...