| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S114551
|
In re Steele
Under Penal Code Section 1054.9, petitioner is now entitled to discovery of materials not provided at trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
01-10666
|
U.S. v. Lewis
Trial that commenced over two years after defendant's initial arraignment was in violation of Speedy Trial Act. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
02-16481
|
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Service
U.S. Forest Service's failure to disclose and analyze opposing scientific viewpoints regarding goshawks violates environmental laws and regulations. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
99-17643
|
Griffey v. Lindsey
Order |
|
May 19, 2004 | ||
|
02-15635
|
The Company v. U.S.
Private parties are not obligated to assist the FBI in intercepting communications when interference would hinder services provided. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
01-36113
|
American Consumer Publishing Association Inc. v. Margosian
Abstention principles are properly invoked only when adjudicating claim for damages would directly interfere with pending state proceeding. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
01-36033
|
Johnson v. Reilly
Parole commission wasn't required to hold revocation hearing based on parole violator warrant which subsequently had supplemental charges added to it. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
01-17332
|
Gallo v. U.S. District Court for District of Arizona
Court rule requiring attorney to complete pro hac vice application before appearance is constitutional. |
Attorneys |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
02-15589
|
Morrissey v. Stuteville
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel did not err in imposing sanctions in response to defendant's egregious procedural violations. |
Bankruptcy |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
02-56197
|
Ileto v. Glock Inc.
Victims of shooting rampage may sue gun manufacturers for negligence and public nuisance. |
Torts |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
02-35116
|
Murphy v. Schneider National Inc.
Defendant's Rule 12(b)(3) motion was improperly granted because factual allegations were not resolved in plaintiff's favor. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
00-56988
|
Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization INcome Protection Plan
Order |
|
May 19, 2004 | ||
|
00-56988
|
Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan
Where benefits plan administrator fails to timely decide employee's appeal, 'deemed denial,' judicial review is de novo. |
Employment Law |
|
May 19, 2004 | |
|
04-70578
|
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
02-35929
|
Farrell v. Principi
Plaintiff may proceed with civil action against agency because action seeks de novo review of claim, not enforcement of agency's final order. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 18, 2004 | |
|
S123118
|
Blitz v. Fluor Enterprises
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S122948
|
Slaney v. Ranger Insurance
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S122086
|
MacPhee on Discipline
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S123242
|
Retana v. TIG Insurance
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S123133
|
People v. Brendlin
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S124328
|
Gonzalez v. W.C.A.B. (County of San Bernardino)
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S123059
|
Alden v. Nelson
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S123144
|
People v. Rigby-Fene
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S123548
|
Binion v. Storer Transportation
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S122974
|
Marriage of Lewis
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S123525
|
People v. Laiwala
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S123741
|
Marriage of Escobar
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
S124014
|
Gonzalez v. W.C.A.B. (Tom Bell Chevrolet)
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 | ||
|
01-36071
|
Alsea Valley Alliance v. Dept. of Commerce
Court lacks jurisdiction over appeal of remand order and intervention order because neither is final decision. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 18, 2004 | |
|
01-35028
|
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States
Order |
|
May 18, 2004 |
