For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Jennifer B. Zargarof

See more on Jennifer B. Zargarof

Partner
employment litigation
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Los Angeles , CA

Phone: (213) 612-7335
Email: jennifer.zargarof@morganlewis.com

New York Univ SOL; New York NY



Columns
Title Category Published
Eyes are on Starbucks case at state high court Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court Jul. 18, 2018

Verdicts & Settlements
Case Name Topic Role Published
Daniel Marden, on behalf of himself and all other aggrieved employees v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., Longs Drug Stores California LLC, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Oct. 20, 2023
Ingrid Fragoso and Erica Linthicum, on behalf of themselves and all other aggrieved employees v. Taco Bell Corp., Taco Bell of America LLC, J and R Hock Enterprises Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Aug. 11, 2023
Carole Lewallen, an individual California resident v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., Caremark LLC Employment Law Defendant Jul. 1, 2022
Felix Perez, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CVS Health Corporation, et al. Employment Law Defendant Jul. 16, 2021
Trang Nguyen v. Nordstrom, Inc. Labor Law Defendant Jun. 11, 2021
Kimberly Murphy, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc., Garfield Beach CVS LLC, Longs Drug Stores California LLC, and Does 1 to 10 Employment Law Defendant Dec. 3, 2016
Chanel Lemar, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CVS Pharmarcy Inc., Garfield Beach CVS LLC, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Sep. 19, 2015
Bhupinder Rai, Oscar Martinez, and Aaron Cervantes, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmarcy Inc., and Does 1 through 1000, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Nov. 2, 2013
Dawn Till and Mary Josephs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Saks Inc., Saks Fifth Avenue Inc., Saks & Co. and Saks Fifth Avenue Off Fifth Employment Law Defendant Oct. 19, 2013
Dat Chau, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Dale Hildebrand, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Gabe S. Tong, individually v. CVS RX Services Inc. Employment Law Defendant Nov. 22, 2008
Mark Slagel, Hector DeLeon, Lisa Wolfe, Jenny Drago, Dan Favrin, individually, and on behalf of those similarly situated persons and as a member of the general public v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm General Insurance Company, all other entities that comprise the State Farm Insu Employment Law Defendant Oct. 18, 2008
Title Category Published
Eyes are on Starbucks case at state high court Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court Jul. 18, 2018
Case Name Topic Role Published
Daniel Marden, on behalf of himself and all other aggrieved employees v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., Longs Drug Stores California LLC, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Oct. 20, 2023
Ingrid Fragoso and Erica Linthicum, on behalf of themselves and all other aggrieved employees v. Taco Bell Corp., Taco Bell of America LLC, J and R Hock Enterprises Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Aug. 11, 2023
Carole Lewallen, an individual California resident v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., Caremark LLC Employment Law Defendant Jul. 1, 2022
Felix Perez, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CVS Health Corporation, et al. Employment Law Defendant Jul. 16, 2021
Trang Nguyen v. Nordstrom, Inc. Labor Law Defendant Jun. 11, 2021
Kimberly Murphy, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc., Garfield Beach CVS LLC, Longs Drug Stores California LLC, and Does 1 to 10 Employment Law Defendant Dec. 3, 2016
Chanel Lemar, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CVS Pharmarcy Inc., Garfield Beach CVS LLC, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Sep. 19, 2015
Bhupinder Rai, Oscar Martinez, and Aaron Cervantes, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmarcy Inc., and Does 1 through 1000, inclusive Employment Law Defendant Nov. 2, 2013
Dawn Till and Mary Josephs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Saks Inc., Saks Fifth Avenue Inc., Saks & Co. and Saks Fifth Avenue Off Fifth Employment Law Defendant Oct. 19, 2013
Dat Chau, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Dale Hildebrand, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Gabe S. Tong, individually v. CVS RX Services Inc. Employment Law Defendant Nov. 22, 2008
Mark Slagel, Hector DeLeon, Lisa Wolfe, Jenny Drago, Dan Favrin, individually, and on behalf of those similarly situated persons and as a member of the general public v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Corporation, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm General Insurance Company, all other entities that comprise the State Farm Insu Employment Law Defendant Oct. 18, 2008
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.