This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental & Energy,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Feb. 6, 2020

Panel mulls whether oil nuisance suit belongs in state or federal court

Counsel for Oakland and San Francisco described the public nuisance suit against BP P.L.C., Chevron Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation and other defendants as a local matter seeking to remedy harms fossil fuel burning has caused the cities over recent decades, like rising sea levels and degraded air quality.

Attorneys for Bay Area cities and several oil industry titans presented starkly different framing of a climate change-related suit to 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges during an argument session Wednesday in Pasadena.

Counsel for Oakland and San Francisco described the public nuisance suit against BP PLC, Chevron Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation and other defendants as a local matter seeking to remedy harms fossil fuel b...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up