Environmental & Energy
Nov. 4, 2020
PG&E acknowledges ‘process breakdown’ in checking high-risk fire areas
A report filed Tuesday was made in response to a demand for an explanation by U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who oversees the utility’s criminal probation stemming from the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion, over findings that PG&E prioritized reaching inspection targets instead of meaningfully trying to mitigate wildfire risk.




Operational delays caused Pacific Gas & Electric's failure to perform inspections on transmission towers in the highest fire-threat areas, the utility told a federal judge Tuesday in a court filing.
"This was a process breakdown," PG&E attorney Reid Schar wrote. "That decision did not align with PG&E's intent to prioritize work in a risk-informed manner, and PG&E is examining the episode to learn from it."
<...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In