This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental & Energy

Nov. 4, 2020

PG&E acknowledges ‘process breakdown’ in checking high-risk fire areas

A report filed Tuesday was made in response to a demand for an explanation by U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who oversees the utility’s criminal probation stemming from the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion, over findings that PG&E prioritized reaching inspection targets instead of meaningfully trying to mitigate wildfire risk.

Operational delays caused Pacific Gas & Electric's failure to perform inspections on transmission towers in the highest fire-threat areas, the utility told a federal judge Tuesday in a court filing.

"This was a process breakdown," PG&E attorney Reid Schar wrote. "That decision did not align with PG&E's intent to prioritize work in a risk-informed manner, and PG&E is examining the episode to learn from it."

<...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up