Constitutional Law
Jun. 17, 2021
Ruling in gun case rightfully rejected well-practiced talking points
The court scrutinized the state’s “evidence” submitted at trial to justify the law, found it inadequate, and declared California’s laws unconstitutional.
C.D. Michel
Senior Partner
Michel & Associates PC
180 E Ocean Blvd Ste 200
Long Beach , California 90802
Phone: (562) 216-4444
Email: cmichel@michellawyers.com
Loyola Law School
C.D. is a civil rights attorney, civil litigator and senior partner at Michel & Associates, LLP in Long Beach. Among its many other clients, the firm has represented firearm owners, retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, as well as the NRA and the California Rifle & Pistol Association since 1993.
On June 4, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez issued a 94-page opinion in Miller v. Bonta, 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB) (S.D. Cal.), a Second Amendment challenge to California's "assault weapon" law. The ruling scrutinized the state's "evidence" submitted at trial to just...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
Overturning assault weapon ban sets dangerous precedent
By Hannah Shearer, Lisa Tu
Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
9th Circuit gun magazine debate appears aimed at Supreme Court
By Craig Anderson
Constitutional Law
Judge ignored facts, law while taking knife to assault weapons ban
By Scott A. Edelman, Jillian N. London, Craig Streit
