For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Apr. 29, 2024

Navigating California’s bans against non-compete clauses

Remote workers who work in California only part of the time may not be covered by § 925, but they may still be able to void their non-compete agreements under § 16600 if they file suit in California or in a state that respects California’s laws.

Shutterstock

In this second installment of our series discussing key topics of interest for general counsels (GCs) in California, we unpack ways GCs can plan ahead in light of new legislation passed in California regarding non-compete clauses.

New developments in California’s non-compete landscape

California’s long-standing non-compete law, California...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Related Content

Business Law

Techno Lite v. EMCOD LLC

Business and Professions Code Section 16600 invalidates any employment agreement that unreasonably interferes with employee's ability to compete with employer 'after' employment ends; thu...

Business Law

The Retirement Group v. Galante

Preliminary injunction containing noncompetition provision exceeds authority of California law where sufficient trade secret protection was afforded.

Arbitration

Brown v. TGS Management Co., LLC

Arbitrator exceeded his power in issuing award enforcing provisions of employment agreement which illegally restricted plaintiff's right to work.



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.