For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Stephen M. Duvernay

See more on Stephen M. Duvernay

Sacramento , CA

Phone: (916) 447-4900
Email: steve@benbrooklawgroup.com

Stephen M. Duvernay is an attorney at Benbrook Law Group, where he provides litigation and counseling services for matters arising in the constitutional, political, administrative, and public policy arenas. He also serves as Chief Senior Research Fellow at the California Constitution Center at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law.

Notre Dame Law School; Notre Dame IN



Columns
Title Category Published
Supreme Court ruling against ATF's bump stock ban leaves it up to Congress U.S. Supreme Court, Administrative/Regulatory Jun. 21, 2024
Castellanos shows the futility of petitions for review California Supreme Court Apr. 12, 2023
Rose Bird was not recalled Judges and Judiciary Jul. 20, 2022
The secret to SCOCA’s consensus U.S. Supreme Court, California Supreme Court Jun. 20, 2022
Your town is not an independent republic Government, Constitutional Law Dec. 20, 2021
Everyone gets along on the California Supreme Court U.S. Supreme Court, California Supreme Court Feb. 19, 2021
Two cooks in California’s policy kitchen Constitutional Law Aug. 10, 2020
The governor’s emergency powers are just right Government, Constitutional Law Mar. 23, 2020
Equal Rights Amendment is still in play, if Congress wants it to be Government, Constitutional Law Jan. 16, 2020
California’s constitution needs some changes Constitutional Law, California Supreme Court Oct. 29, 2019
Governor Sunshine’s Court Judges and Judiciary, California Supreme Court Dec. 31, 2018
California needs a lawyer Government, Constitutional Law Jun. 22, 2018
Leaner bar is good for attorneys and the public Government, California Supreme Court Jul. 25, 2017
Prop. N doesn't pass muster Constitutional Law Nov. 22, 2016
Why the rush to dissolve the bar? Ethics/Professional Responsibility, State Bar & Bar Associations Apr. 14, 2016
Justices should review SF gun law U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Mar. 27, 2015
Six problems with 'Six Californias' initiative Constitutional Law Mar. 12, 2014

Verdicts & Settlements
Case Name Topic Role Published
Great Northern Resources Inc., Dynamic Service Fire and Security LLC, Walter Van Leja, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. Katy Coba, in her official capacity as State Chief Operating Officer and Director of Oregon Department of Administrative Services, The Contingent, Black United Fund of Oregon Inc., and Does 1-10 Civil Rights Plaintiff May 14, 2021
Tracy Rifle and Pistol LLC; Michael Baryla; Ten Percent Firearms; Wesley Morris; Sacramento Black Rifle Inc.; Robert Adams; PRK Arms Inc.; Jeffrey Mullen; Imbert & Smithers Inc.; Alex Rolsky v. Kamala D. Harris, in Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of California; and Stephen J. Lindley, in His Official Capacity as Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms Constitutional Law Plaintiff Apr. 26, 2019
Ezell, et al., v. Reynen & Bardis Development, LLC, et al.; Willyoung, et al., v. Reynen & Bardis Development, LLC, et al.; McGuire, et al., v. Reynen & Bardis Development, LLC, et al.; Blomquist, et al., v. Reynen & Bardis Development, LLC, et al.; Lynn, et al., v. Reynen & Bardis Development, LLC, et al.; Hartmann, et al., v. Reynen & Bardis Deve Construction Defendant Feb. 26, 2011
Title Category Published
Supreme Court ruling against ATF's bump stock ban leaves it up to Congress U.S. Supreme Court, Administrative/Regulatory Jun. 21, 2024
Castellanos shows the futility of petitions for review California Supreme Court Apr. 12, 2023
Rose Bird was not recalled Judges and Judiciary Jul. 20, 2022
The secret to SCOCA’s consensus U.S. Supreme Court, California Supreme Court Jun. 20, 2022
Your town is not an independent republic Government, Constitutional Law Dec. 20, 2021
Everyone gets along on the California Supreme Court U.S. Supreme Court, California Supreme Court Feb. 19, 2021
Two cooks in California’s policy kitchen Constitutional Law Aug. 10, 2020
The governor’s emergency powers are just right Government, Constitutional Law Mar. 23, 2020
Equal Rights Amendment is still in play, if Congress wants it to be Government, Constitutional Law Jan. 16, 2020
California’s constitution needs some changes Constitutional Law, California Supreme Court Oct. 29, 2019
Governor Sunshine’s Court Judges and Judiciary, California Supreme Court Dec. 31, 2018
California needs a lawyer Government, Constitutional Law Jun. 22, 2018
Leaner bar is good for attorneys and the public Government, California Supreme Court Jul. 25, 2017
Prop. N doesn't pass muster Constitutional Law Nov. 22, 2016
Why the rush to dissolve the bar? Ethics/Professional Responsibility, State Bar & Bar Associations Apr. 14, 2016
Justices should review SF gun law U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Mar. 27, 2015
Six problems with 'Six Californias' initiative Constitutional Law Mar. 12, 2014
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.