This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Judges and Judiciary,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Jun. 16, 2020

Ethics rule clears way for judges to respond to critics

Judges facing an election challenge will now be able to publicly respond to criticism of a pending case under an amended ethics rule that has garnered overwhelming support.

Judges facing an election challenge will be able to publicly respond to criticism of a pending case under an amended ethics rule that has garnered overwhelming support.

Effective July 1, a judge may comment publicly about a pending case when that case is used as criticism of a judge during a judicial election or recall campaign, but only if that comment would not reasonably be expected to affect a proceeding's impartiality, according...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up